Why there is that wide gap of the educational system in Canada compared to other countries in the world as if the Bureau of Education do not want Canadians to excel in the Academics? Obviously the system of education is by far higher than any other educational system in other countries. It's difficult to pass. They don't want you to pass.
Who really is the leader of this country? Is it a country or a nation?
Emphasis on the Non-Academics rather than the Academics?
Because SPORTS matter than anything else. The SPORTS that happened million years ago then the beginning of the OLYMPIC GAMES only made it hard to acquire large tract of land. ONLY when the country represented by their Olympic athletes acquired so much gold in their hands and which equal to the amount, the value and size of land catapulted into conquest, yes it's the modern conquest. It is the modern war. Another way of colonization without resulting to death. Olympic athletes are your modern soldiers.
Because they want Canadian-born children to stay at home. Being ambitious means going abroad and will only be the cause of BRAIN DRAIN and land acquisition by other foreigners who are just waiting for the inhabitants to move out.
Large open spaces, wide tract of land, a continent that needs stay-in loyal inhabitants guarding the land.
Ambitious people mostly those who are educated seek to move out of the country reaching for greener pasture thereby leaving the home and land they acquired in the first place. If you moved out of the country then you lose your land.
In other words you are part of the CHANGE. Either you lose your land and citizenship acquiring a new citizenship and a new land, and new leadership.
Where is the loyalty?
Are you ready for the change?
Dude, this is not South park okay?
But you can go find Kenny.
Friday, May 29, 2015
Monday, May 25, 2015
Maybe
Darn! So many unemployed people nowadays. What to do with them? So many graduates who are unemployed and out there sending resumes to their would-be employers. Problem is ... out of hundred thousand applicants only few will be chosen to take the tests and interviews. The saddest part is what if the company only want ONE out of these thousands? One out of hundreds who tried hard to be employed.
I was once employed in a company, long time ago when there are hundreds of employees and there's not enough work for these workers. The workers end up sitting on their desks doing nothing, Others stand by, walking, chatting with their co-workers, or stayed most of the time at the cafeteria. So why the company keeps these workers if they don't have work to do? That's the question. I don't have answer. Truth is maybe they are just guarding the company as look- outs.
Maybe there are so many guards in civilian employees and only one or three workers doing the clerical job. Maybe they are other duties we don't know about. Maybe they are the listeners. Well, I don't know the answer. It's not for me to answer such question all I know that I'm doing my job the best I can and if they are not working and they are paid to do nothing it's up for the owner of the company to observe. It's not my duty to report such thing. It's just that out of curiosity it made me think that some people are expendables and maybe the owners knew such kind of value system and God knows, who am I to fight the system that was established since the time of the Spanish era.
I just don't know. FGS! Am I a member of the "Know-Nothing?"
I was once employed in a company, long time ago when there are hundreds of employees and there's not enough work for these workers. The workers end up sitting on their desks doing nothing, Others stand by, walking, chatting with their co-workers, or stayed most of the time at the cafeteria. So why the company keeps these workers if they don't have work to do? That's the question. I don't have answer. Truth is maybe they are just guarding the company as look- outs.
Maybe there are so many guards in civilian employees and only one or three workers doing the clerical job. Maybe they are other duties we don't know about. Maybe they are the listeners. Well, I don't know the answer. It's not for me to answer such question all I know that I'm doing my job the best I can and if they are not working and they are paid to do nothing it's up for the owner of the company to observe. It's not my duty to report such thing. It's just that out of curiosity it made me think that some people are expendables and maybe the owners knew such kind of value system and God knows, who am I to fight the system that was established since the time of the Spanish era.
I just don't know. FGS! Am I a member of the "Know-Nothing?"
Tuesday, May 19, 2015
The WORK WORLD with PAY and BENEFITS
There's that new age employer who relied on choosing applicants through the social media outlet. What can you advise them? Them > as in plural because there's not only one employer who would like to know. Maybe you are curious too.
FIRST and foremost, you want an honest opinion? RELY first on the applicant's bio-data or comprehensive resume given to you personally. Whatever is written on those pertinent documents are the truth. It tells you of the applicant's educational background, work experience, training and references.
Here's what's wrong with the "background check" through social media outlets? Some of them are exaggerations, if not altered. Few of them are pranks and really if you keep checking the applicant's background like as if you are chasing "Jason Bourne"in Bourne Identity; then you are losing your money, time and effort to actually know the true real person. A job applicant is a person who would like to work for your company and what could be your company? Applicants have the power to know your standing and background as well. Applicants knew where they can better be protected and employed safely and be compensated.
YES THE RIGHT WORD IS COMPENSATED! New employees want to be employed, work with pay. There is no way that workers should volunteer or work without pay.
Human resources have to employ people with the same jurisdiction as the applicants knowing who are in that Human resources department. This is the true nature of what employment is to the new world order.
No one is left behind now. Employers out there should stop the manipulation of employing workers without pay and benefits. You can try these new trainees to work with "allowance." We are not at war. When you don't pay the workers the money becomes part of the graft and corruption.
FIRST and foremost, you want an honest opinion? RELY first on the applicant's bio-data or comprehensive resume given to you personally. Whatever is written on those pertinent documents are the truth. It tells you of the applicant's educational background, work experience, training and references.
Here's what's wrong with the "background check" through social media outlets? Some of them are exaggerations, if not altered. Few of them are pranks and really if you keep checking the applicant's background like as if you are chasing "Jason Bourne"in Bourne Identity; then you are losing your money, time and effort to actually know the true real person. A job applicant is a person who would like to work for your company and what could be your company? Applicants have the power to know your standing and background as well. Applicants knew where they can better be protected and employed safely and be compensated.
YES THE RIGHT WORD IS COMPENSATED! New employees want to be employed, work with pay. There is no way that workers should volunteer or work without pay.
Human resources have to employ people with the same jurisdiction as the applicants knowing who are in that Human resources department. This is the true nature of what employment is to the new world order.
No one is left behind now. Employers out there should stop the manipulation of employing workers without pay and benefits. You can try these new trainees to work with "allowance." We are not at war. When you don't pay the workers the money becomes part of the graft and corruption.
Monday, May 11, 2015
Game of War? WAR GAMES?
I was watching the documentary on TV last month of those veterans telling their own stories during the war of World war II and sharing some facts with their interviewer so that they can document their fears, their bravery and how they were able to survive during the chaotic violent war. You know when old people told stories you have to believe them the way how they fought and be triumphant. They survived inside a tank without any blemish, scars on their face! Wow! No burn marks nor any cut or wound scar from the fight? From the harsh war which is kind of complicate the story whether it's true or not or they are part of the war during those period of war era.
Watch FURY the movie of Brad Pitt. The war movie looks more believable because of the scar on Brad Pitt's face. There are wound scar and the same kind of evidence we would like to see from those veterans of today that they really fought a terrifying ordeal of a very hellish out of this world WAR. It seems to me that they fought something else. Those veterans who were shown on the documentary looks like they played war on books only. Did you know that you can have radiation scar on your face, arms, hands, ears and neck by just playing war games on your computer? With RADIATION you can't see it coming. It's like a pinch or stung by a mosquito on your neck, face and ears. Next thing you know those bites , yeah BITES increased and moles keep popping up like crazy. then it gets bigger until it becomes melanoma or skin cancer! That's how bad it is in front of the computer. CONSIDER THE RISK. It's okay if we are all paid from all this I.T. For these people to tell their stories about war in World War II without any blemish and without any wound or scar on their face, arms, and bodies? Tell it to the marines! Being inside the tank is like being inside the convection oven. The heat inside it is enough to burn the soldiers skin. There's no aircon inside the tank. well, World War II was a war story on the great, great infrastructure and great depression gone bad!!!!!!
We want the truth.
Okay they probably didn't have blemish or wound scar from bullets and shrapnels wounds from the war but their legs or arms were amputated and some of them suffered from the anguish of PTSD. Maybe they had their face under surgery (plastic surgery) to keep their face looks completely smooth and photoshopped helps too. Celebrities are benefitted from photoshop so maybe those veterans have benefitted from the photoshop series. I think it's good to advertise veterans without scars on their face and hands and legs so that the war propaganda is better than ever. Eh? It brings a better view that war is good. Yeah promote GAME OF WAR.
To those true real WAR VETS who suffered, under scrutiny and those who sacrificed themselves to bring peace and order + reconciliation > I SALUTE THEM. My utmost respect and gratitude for their sacrifices to win the war against tyranny, oppression, poverty and terrorism.
Watch FURY the movie of Brad Pitt. The war movie looks more believable because of the scar on Brad Pitt's face. There are wound scar and the same kind of evidence we would like to see from those veterans of today that they really fought a terrifying ordeal of a very hellish out of this world WAR. It seems to me that they fought something else. Those veterans who were shown on the documentary looks like they played war on books only. Did you know that you can have radiation scar on your face, arms, hands, ears and neck by just playing war games on your computer? With RADIATION you can't see it coming. It's like a pinch or stung by a mosquito on your neck, face and ears. Next thing you know those bites , yeah BITES increased and moles keep popping up like crazy. then it gets bigger until it becomes melanoma or skin cancer! That's how bad it is in front of the computer. CONSIDER THE RISK. It's okay if we are all paid from all this I.T. For these people to tell their stories about war in World War II without any blemish and without any wound or scar on their face, arms, and bodies? Tell it to the marines! Being inside the tank is like being inside the convection oven. The heat inside it is enough to burn the soldiers skin. There's no aircon inside the tank. well, World War II was a war story on the great, great infrastructure and great depression gone bad!!!!!!
We want the truth.
Okay they probably didn't have blemish or wound scar from bullets and shrapnels wounds from the war but their legs or arms were amputated and some of them suffered from the anguish of PTSD. Maybe they had their face under surgery (plastic surgery) to keep their face looks completely smooth and photoshopped helps too. Celebrities are benefitted from photoshop so maybe those veterans have benefitted from the photoshop series. I think it's good to advertise veterans without scars on their face and hands and legs so that the war propaganda is better than ever. Eh? It brings a better view that war is good. Yeah promote GAME OF WAR.
To those true real WAR VETS who suffered, under scrutiny and those who sacrificed themselves to bring peace and order + reconciliation > I SALUTE THEM. My utmost respect and gratitude for their sacrifices to win the war against tyranny, oppression, poverty and terrorism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)